<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MultiZ: Search Engine Blog</title>
	<link>http://multiz.com/blog</link>
	<description>Leading information on search development.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by admin</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/about/#comment-17</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/about/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>This is a strange page to ask this question...

But, you can change the script however you'd like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a strange page to ask this question&#8230;</p>
<p>But, you can change the script however you&#8217;d like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by bill</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/about/#comment-16</link>
		<author>bill</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/about/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi, can the script for ,ultiz be adapted for your own domain, logo etc? Does it have to be reffered to multiz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, can the script for ,ultiz be adapted for your own domain, logo etc? Does it have to be reffered to multiz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is wrong with MSN/Live.com search? by admin</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/what-is-wrong-with-msnlivecom-search/#comment-9</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/what-is-wrong-with-msnlivecom-search/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Michael Martinez, what fun would that be?

On a more serious note, not only would I have to optimize for "multiz" but "multi" as well.  "Multi" is a fairly common prefix and would not be that easy to rank high for even if I try using in-site SEO well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Martinez, what fun would that be?</p>
<p>On a more serious note, not only would I have to optimize for &#8220;multiz&#8221; but &#8220;multi&#8221; as well.  &#8220;Multi&#8221; is a fairly common prefix and would not be that easy to rank high for even if I try using in-site SEO well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is wrong with MSN/Live.com search? by Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/what-is-wrong-with-msnlivecom-search/#comment-8</link>
		<author>Michael Martinez</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/what-is-wrong-with-msnlivecom-search/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>You could always try optimizing your root URL for the word "multiz" rather than ranting at a search engine for not relying on link anchor text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always try optimizing your root URL for the word &#8220;multiz&#8221; rather than ranting at a search engine for not relying on link anchor text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Search Result Are You Going to Click? by Steve M</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/which-search-result-are-you-going-to-click/#comment-7</link>
		<author>Steve M</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/which-search-result-are-you-going-to-click/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Being first in any search ranking gives you a massive head start against the competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being first in any search ranking gives you a massive head start against the competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visualized Search Engines by admin</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/visualized_search-engines-search/#comment-4</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/visualized_search-engines-search/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The "enhanced web search" is certainly interesting but it did not work on my Mac OSX but did work on Windows.  I think a few bugs still need to be worked out with Snap.com before its a major success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although, I’d have to say Snap.com has been great at creating a “buzz” for their site and promoting it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;enhanced web search&#8221; is certainly interesting but it did not work on my Mac OSX but did work on Windows.  I think a few bugs still need to be worked out with Snap.com before its a major success.</p>
<p>Although, I’d have to say Snap.com has been great at creating a “buzz” for their site and promoting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visualized Search Engines by Tom McGovern</title>
		<link>http://multiz.com/blog/visualized_search-engines-search/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Tom McGovern</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://multiz.com/blog/visualized_search-engines-search/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>On Snap.com you should try our "enhanced web search" tab.  We deliver large previews of every web page (we have the largest web page image library int he world) which you can surf by using your arrow keys or scroll wheel.  

On our home page, sorry our efforts to promote publisher products is distracting.  I see your point there.

Thanks

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Snap.com you should try our &#8220;enhanced web search&#8221; tab.  We deliver large previews of every web page (we have the largest web page image library int he world) which you can surf by using your arrow keys or scroll wheel.  </p>
<p>On our home page, sorry our efforts to promote publisher products is distracting.  I see your point there.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
